THE PEOPLE OF SPARKS

My readercrush on Jeanne DuPrau has only grown with the second book in the Ember series, THE PEOPLE OF SPARKS. In a world recovering from apocalyptic war and disease, how will a small town which has only just begun to prosper respond to an unexpected influx of refugees? Both story and style are clear, direct and unshowy: every step follows simply and seamlessly from the last. (Speaking to DuPrau’s background as a technical writer perhaps?) Before you know it you’re looking at a rich and nuanced picture of conflict–over resource and identity intertwined–where group belonging is both necessary and dangerous.

“Doon felt frozen. All he could think was, He’s right. Of course he’s right. But we’re right, too.”

The book is 100% adventure story and at the same time unapologetically morally serious. I would call it an illustrative introduction to sectarianism but that makes it sound boring, and it isn’t. DuPrau never flinches from consequence, but she also presents a meaningful picture of hope. And like Byatt she feels in her bones the irreplaceable romance, the great humanist sacredness, of work, every kind of real work. I read the book aloud to kiddo and my voice cracked with tears toward the end. Lucky for me, there’s a third book.

THE CITY OF EMBER by Jeanne DuPrau

I recently stumbled upon an old secondhand copy of THE CITY OF EMBER by Jeanne DuPrau that I’d once bought somewhere—a garage sale, I think it was—having found the film reasonably entertaining. I was surprised at how warmly I felt towards this children’s book upon reading it. To summarise it suggests a familiar genre feel: two twelve-year-olds must save their city, which is falling apart in a post-apocalyptic world which has lost its memory of the past. But it has a quiet, serious simplicity which I think sets it apart. In many respects the book is an elegantly crafted puzzle box, and a love letter to scientific literacy, in a first principles sense of the phrase. Lina and Doon can only rescue themselves by paying careful attention to the physical world around them and teasing out—partly with method and persistence, and partly with simple luck—the natural mysteries of existence. Their longing for something real and important, for an honest understanding which is practical, and can be shared, is powerfully contrasted against the temptations of status climbing and acquisition, embodied, in this strange new economy, in cans of peaches and colour pencils. As a children’s allegory for true-heartedness in the face of corruption, it is remarkably clear without being trite. I am looking forward to the second book in the series.

SUPERIOR by Angela Saini

I’ve just finished reading SUPERIOR by Angela Saini, which looks at the return of ‘race science’. I started it a few weeks ago, but obviously the subject has gained additional resonance in the last few days.

Saini tours the history of ‘race’ as an European pseudo-scientific invention of recent centuries, and examines how this allegedly biological concept and the narratives of our ancestral origin have always been shaped in service to the political demands of power. (The author is British, of Indian descent.)

From the belief that indigenous Australians are a kind of vestigial ‘primitive’ version of modern humanity, to the horrors of Nazism, to the attempts to ‘scientifically’ justify casteism, and the resurgence of the ‘cleaned-up’ ‘population genetics’ of ‘statistical averages’–hiding old wine in new skins–it’s an eminently readable and thought-provoking book which I would recommend to all as I think it provides important challenges to many of our common assumptions. The reality of the patterns of human migration over geological time really confounds the shorthand that many of us still fall back on–thinking short-sightedly only in terms of recent recorded history, and also in terms that that recent history has wrongheadedly imposed on the ancient past.

Even those of us who aspire to anti-racism may not be aware of how the conceptual assumptions of racism permeate the very definition of categories within which we frequently think and speak. I honestly think this is uncomfortable reading for everyone, pulling back some of the curtains on unhelpful hidden mental machinery, in quite a different way even from more purely sociological readings of racially differentiated experience. Anti-racists are right to criticise so-called ‘colour blindness’ when race is a social reality with material social consequences, but this book makes me think there is also a widely missing piece in the puzzle of how we create for the future concepts of identity, origin and ancestry which don’t reify notions which come, at bottom, from hierarchies of oppression to begin with.

My first picture book

Screenshot 2020-05-18 at 10.20.55 AM

Humongously excited to announce that my first picture book, SATURDAY’S SURPRISINGLY SUPER-DUPER LESSON, wonderfully illustrated by Isabella Tong, is now available for pre-order! Ships in June.

There was some talk going around a while ago about the possible involvement of pangolins in the spread of the new coronavirus. I’m extremely fond of the one that makes an appearance in this little tale, and I will vouch that it did not carry any zoonotic diseases.

The Nickel Boys

In THE NICKEL BOYS, Colson Whitehead wields all the majesty and mastery he displayed in THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD–the power of vision that lets him hold in the same frame, in perfect balance, extremes of both violence and tenderness–but trains all of these elements with a more intimate focus. It’s the story of two boys and the birth and death and rebirth of their dreams; and it’s the story of hope and hopelessness, married forever, survival and its cost in an unjust world. A perfect, essential novel.

Loss Adjustment

LOSS ADJUSTMENT by Linda Collins. I simultaneously knew I had to read this, and also put it off for months. The book sets out the reflections of a Kiwi expat in Singapore, whose daughter ended her own life, aged 17, leaving behind distraught parents and luminously written teenage journals.

A book which would move anyone, I think, but which presents a particularly terrifying journey for a parent. I wept more or less continuously for the first third, and then later every few pages. Creating this was an extraordinary and generous act of observation. Details catalogued with knife-sharp lucidity, each one exposing another facet of pain. Read it.

Interview with Centre for Stories

I have an author interview up at Centre for Stories: on early reading and writing, my fiction to date and work to come. I realise this is probably also the first place I’ve mentioned publicly that I’ve signed a contract for a children’s picture book. It should be out next year; watch this space for details!

Reading for me was very private, the most real of realities but impossible to truly discuss with people around me…

Come say hello!

Two bookish things I’m doing this September!

[Edited to add: I’ve just realised I keep saying 4 September; the first event is on 11 September! Apologies for any confusion.]

Wednesday 11 September

I’ll be doing an author meet-and-greet at the Huggs-Epigram Coffee Bookshop on from 10am to 2pm. Come and say hi and talk books! Or anything else, really. RSVP here (or not, if you’d rather not, but it’s nice to have a sense of numbers!). The cafe is also just a really nice space (I’ve hung out there a few times more informally) where you can pick up local books. I know there are a few I have my eye on, like HOMELESS by Liyana Dhamirah.

Saturday 21 September

No photo description available.

I’ll be running KIDS READ FOR THE FUTURE, a reading corner at the Singapore Climate Rally! Come to Hong Lim Park from 3.30pm, bring your kids, show your support for Singapore to pursue a programme of decarbonisation to truly mitigate–not just adapt to–climate change. I’ll have some great children’s nature-themed books which I’ll be reading to kids. Details here.

Internment by Samira Ahmed

Today, the two biggest world powers openly run racist concentration camps. So I was in two minds when, browsing the public library shelves, I stumbled on INTERNMENT by Samira Ahmed, a YA novel set in a near-future United States which begins detaining Muslim citizens in internment camps. The story of a teenage girl fomenting dissent within the first camp, the book seemed on one level attractive (children/young people need human stories to understand such matters, and they need exemplars of action and hope); and yet also almost inevitably inappropriate.

Is it in the power of fictional dramatisation to do justice to the peoples wronged by such camps, past, present and potential? Should it be attempted, and if so, how? To be sure, I love—I have been immeasurably enriched by—many works that seek to engage the horrors of fascism. But even with the most sensitive and accomplished creations, one reckons with the ethical question of fashioning beauty from blood—the risk of artistic vampirism.

What more when a book strives to hew, as INTERNMENT does, to contemporary YA conventions? A pacy and satisfying plot, depicting individual triumph, in a world of cruelties that are real and meaningful, but nevertheless defeasible. What if this form simply cannot contain this subject without becoming insulting, distended? What if this kind of human evil is just too much?

Reading the book only heightened my ambivalence. Samira Ahmed renders the sparky, witty and energetic Layla Amin and her family with liveliness and grace. Early scenes are particularly good at conveying the terror and disorientation of their initial displacement, and an important thread running through the book traces the bonds of friendship and solidarity built by Layla with fellow internees, as well as with a camp guard of complicated allegiances. What can and must we risk of ourselves—and others—in projects of political resistance? What might we sacrifice when we speak? What when we are silent? Faced with injustice, where are the various places we might stand on the spectrum from treacherous complicity to passive acquiescence to outright resistance?

These questions are repeatedly probed as Layla ignites rebellion, while standing together with others inside and outside the camp, including her biracial Jewish boyfriend and (in an unduly flattering fictional portrayal) Anonymous. While she ultimately succeeds in bringing down the camp, in a stirring portrait of the power of popular protest, we can never forget that this victory (or perhaps it’s better thought of as a reprieve) comes, like all progress, at a heavy cost.

It is an important message, and yet. I find myself vaguely dissatisfied on counts that range from relatively superficial to more serious, but which all connect up, perhaps, to the difficulty of the subject matter. How bad should the material conditions be in a fictional internment camp? How brutal the treatment? There is a very tricky calculus in thinking about what is reflective of history and reality without descending into some sort of horrible demand for dehumanising “authenticity”. Certainly Samira Ahmed does not take this issue lightly. Layla is a well-read teenager and makes her own clear-eyed acknowledgement of the WWII precedents (the Japanese-American internment camps, the Nazi abominations). I found it impossible, nevertheless, not to find her camp implausibly humane, next to the contemporary examples of migrant children in the US or detainees in Manus Island—and also to be unhappy at myself for harbouring such an absurd standard.

There is a parallel difficulty in the question of how this evil might be defeated. Layla and her fellow internees attain their freedom through the evergreen action movie device of media exposure, prompting popular outrage and protest. I am not sure how to respond to this narrative ploy. Perhaps it is increasingly unconvincing in the face of open, brazen commission of atrocity. Knowing has not closed the camps that exist. Yet sunlight is a tool that democrats (in which I include myself) still cling to, a hope we still indulge. To find it weak when presented in story form is to doubt oneself as much as the story. I also can’t help but feel some political cultural distance in considering the ready risk-taking of Layla’s comrades: perhaps such a thing makes more sense in the United States.

A final few gripes about comparatively minor points. One, why is the Director so persistently reduced to cartoonish elements of physical distastefulness (spit, bulging veins, whiskey breath), and indeed incompetence? Can’t his villainy in running such a place speak for itself? This seemed heavy-handed. Two, I had strong reservations about the clear subtext of romantic tension between Layla and Jake, turncoat prison guard. His heroism alone mildly strains the reader’s credulity, but it is perhaps on balance acceptable in the interests of plot. To further assign him a crush on Layla felt like a rather inappropriate importation from YA love triangle land. Jake’s own explicit acknowledgement that such a relationship would be inherently coercive feels a little too much like lip service next to all the scenes of sentimental devotion.

Lest I be misunderstood: if I have spilled a lot of words on criticism here, it is largely because the project of this book is ambitious and the product reflects real thought and craft, and is well worth engaging with, even if I’m left very much not knowing what to think.